In watching the hearings interviewing Christopher Wray, the F.B.I. Director, and Rod Rosenstein, the assistant Attorney General, it seems that the Democrats were more focused on President Trump’s tweets than the miscarriage of justice perpetuated by Peter Strzok and how the D.O.J. has handled the matter.
The focus of the hearings was to get some answers from the bureau, and the D.O.J. with regard to the delays in documents being provided to Congress, that are required by law, for proper oversight for the American people as to the conduct of the two agencies. Two of the democratic Congresswomen totally flew off base, with one obsessing about the possibility of racial profiling of police officers mistakenly shooting African-American suspects. The other Democrat Congresswoman went on a tirade about the separation of families attempting to enter the country illegally, with the basis of her concerns, mostly on fake news and unsubstantiated rumors about what is actually happening there, and why.
All that being said, the last time I checked, “tweeting” falls under the category of one’s first amendment rights, regardless of what position or office they may hold. Furthermore “Tweets” are by definition, opinions and are not evidence that can be used to indict someone of a crime or for that matter, a definition of one’s character. If the Democrats would spend less time subjectively interpreting the President’s tweets, and more on serving the constituents that elected them, maybe they would have a better approval rating, and who knows maybe accomplish some good things for this country.