Category: Political Perspectives

Cory Booker Tirades

I recently observed a tirade from the Mayor of Newark, Cory Booker expressing his displeasure with the state of affairs in America. Unfortunately, however, the Mayor’s views are so distorted because of the nature of the constituency he represents, that there can be no merit for his discontentment.

Booker represents a district that has extremely disproportionate levels of unemployment, section 8 housing, and welfare dependent families, that have had such generational dependency on the federal government, that almost all ambition and self determination for achievement has been abandoned.

I have been there. The city of Irvington, N.J., a suburb of Newark, is so scary that you lock your car door, while your car is moving. Crime rates in Booker’s district are some of the highest in America. Booker’s policies have consistently doubled down on the pathetic theory, that government handouts can lift people out of the slums. If Booker has aspirations of running for President in 2020, he should look in his own backyard first.

The Democratic programs that he so dearly embraces have only enslaved a large portion of his, and so many districts like it to a life of federal servitude, not unlike that which Abraham Lincoln and many others fought and died to abolish.

The Coming of the Nazi Party to America

In recent days I have seen a trend developing in the Democratic party, embracing the concept of Socialism. Many pundits seem to laugh it off, but I find it necessary to remind those who may be ill informed on the subject, that in the modern era, the most rapid social economic success gained from this form of government has been that of Nazi Germany.

The process occurred in much the same way as what is evident in our culture. The youth was brainwashed into giving their allegiance, much the same as our universities are doing to them now. The only difference in what Bernie Sanders and others like him are espousing, is that instead of wealth being redistributed, it was confiscated. The wealthy were not acclimated, but exterminated. The disloyal not converted, but severely punished. The social economic result, however, is that one of the poorest countries in the world became one of the most powerful in less than ten years. What was the cost for all this to the rest of the world?

I ask Americans this: Is America ready to repeat history? Is this the future we want for America? Make no mistake, once the government has been transformed to the Socialist ideal, that is what will become of us. Once these lunatics rise to power, the lines become blurred the same way that Adolf Hitler did. Though well intended, the wealth and power took over and guided them from there.

Nazi Germany’s rise to power started the exact same way. First the propaganda campaign to separate the country through racial division. Much the same as the media is attempting to do now. The censorship of free, conservative, or contradictory speech, sound familiar yet? Then the promise of income equality, and government run programs for the benefit of all. Anything ringing a bell yet? NAZI, The National Socialist People’s Party. The Future of the Democratic party.

 

Trump/Putin Summit

Unfortunately, I do think President Trump did look like a deer in the headlights when a reporter asked him if he would call out Putin about the Russian meddling in the post meeting  press conference between the two leaders.

Let’s break it down, however. If Trump called Putin out in a public setting like they were in, it would be all over the news that President Trump admitted to the collusion, and the media would have tried and convicted him, and a few decades back, probably had him tarred and feathered. Questions immediately flew around that Trump would rather trust Putin’s word, over that of the American intelligence agencies. I say, he can’t trust Putin, the media, nor his intelligence agencies.

Why would Trump trust these agencies, when he’s had to fire the head of the F.B.I., the assistant is under investigation, the assistant to the attorney general at the D.O.J. is subject of review, even the impeachment word has been circulating, both have publicly indicated bias towards party opposition. The media are constantly fabricating stories to support their questionable agenda. The former head of the C.I.A. has become what amounts to a spokesperson for MSNBC, probably one of the most Liberal left propagandists’ media outlets ever established. Anyone with an I.Q. over 50 would have reason to question the intelligence agencies. These guys have outspokenly put a target on the back of the President to unseat him.

Trump’s response, wisely, was to ask for the corroborating evidence that is required to substantiate the whole collusion premise. We have been given only the prosecution’s side of everything with the Mueller indictments.  What about the defense’s arguments with regard to the relative evidence that could be found or not found on the D.N.C. server, the center of the alleged hack by the Russians?   The D.N.C. server was never released.

What I still find remarkable about the Russian meddling and collusion accusations, is that all the meddling occurred on the Democrats computers and as Trump pointed out, their computer tech-guy has managed to get rid of all the info that pertains to any details pertinent to the alleged meddling.

Somehow, the Republican party and President Trump are the ones that are being accused of wrongdoing. This is like a bank robber that loses the money from the hold up, and the bank employees being accused of the crime.

 

Strzok Hearing

I have a few thoughts after watching some of the theatrics of the Strzok hearings. In recent months, several public officials have resigned their positions amid accusations of sexual misconduct. It is a well known fact at this juncture, that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, another employee at the F.B.I. were having an affair. Though Louie Gohmert’s (Republican) comments about the possible awkward interaction between Strzok and his wife were out of line, it made me wonder; why has Strzok not been asked to resign? Is adultery not considered sexual misconduct? Never mind all the other stuff that is coming to light regarding his mishandling of both the Clinton and Trump investigations.

Additionally, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the Russia collusion probe being conducted by Robert Mueller has become a game of pin the tail (crime) on the donkey, with all sorts of people being charged with everything but, helping Russia interfere with the election process. One Democrat had his own ‘dog and pony’ show by holding held up signs with the faces of people that have been charged with unrelated crimes, and somehow trying to link them to Trump. This is another feeble attempt by Democrats to delegitimize Trump’s Presidency.

Watching and listening to these hearings, and seeing the great lengths the Democrats were undertaking to distract from the issues, only reassured me further, that there is real merit to the accusations laid out against Peter Strzok. Some Democrats claimed that the hearings should focus on the couple thousand illegal immigrants that have been separated from their families while attempting to illegally enter the U.S. I guess that is more important than the millions of American citizens who could be at risk of being charged wrongly of crimes, based on some F.B.I. agent’s political bias.

I had to laugh out loud, when another Democrat stated that if Strzok had reported to the media that Trump was under investigation, prior to the election, we would have a legitimate president now. I have to ask; if at the time, both presidential candidates were under investigation by the F.B.I., why would one be more legitimate than the other?

Oh yeah, by the way, if Strzok had leaked anything to the press, he would have been fired, like Andrew McCabe was, without collecting his pension.

ATTENTION REPUBLICAN VOTERS!!!!! BEWARE!!!!

ATTENTION REPUBLICAN VOTERS!!!!! BEWARE!!!!

When researching the viability of any given Republican candidate, either from the TV ads or other sources, it is of no importance to whom the candidate claims to have  donated to. 

What needs to be looked at is who is funding their campaign. The problem is, this is difficult information to obtain. The funding for a candidate far exceeds the contributions that any candidate would report. The fact is, that the Democrats are actively funding Republican opposition candidates that are claiming to support President Trump’s agenda. Candidates that hail from Democratic districts in any given state are a dead give away.

It’s kind of sad, yet ironic in a way that the Democrats would stoop to this level, but they are out of options at this point. They know that if they can split the vote on the Republican side, their chances of pushing through the Democratic opponent are much better.

My advice is to stick with the more popular candidate that is running, and stay away from the “Johnny come lately” candidates. Don’t buy into the  “Outsider” or the “Businessman”.  These are all just catch phrases to deceive gullible voters into thinking that the candidate resembles President Trump.

Socialist Hypocrites

Last week a self proclaimed Socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won a congressional seat. I can’t help but to laugh out loud when I hear these hypocrites who make these claims. It’s real easy to call oneself a Socialist, when they live in a free Republic like America. It’s kind of like watching American Choppers on television, and calling oneself a master motorcycle mechanic, or House Hunters, and calling oneself a Realtor. I suggest that Cortez, Sanders, and all these other self professing Socialists go live in Cuba for a few years, deposit their money in the bank there, and get a real feel for it. This way they can truly give us outsiders a genuine opinion on the Socialist way of life.

I’m sure the Castros would love to redistribute Bernie Sander’s hundreds of millions of dollars (mostly into their own portfolios), and that goes the same for anyone else with these aspirations.

I submit that all of the misinformed millennials, movie stars, and morons who have these delusions of grandeur, that you put your “money where your mouth is” and gain some real world experience. Then, and only then, can you expect the rest of America to take you seriously. Oh, and by the way, Nazi Germany was a Socialist governing body.

Gulftainer in Delaware State

Lately  there have been outcries for the abolishment of I.C.E. from some of these fringe progressive Democrats. The truth is, that this country is going to need hundreds if not thousands more to address the national security threat that sits literally on the lap of Washington, D.C., and even more frightening, the security threat to some of this country’s now vulnerable, military bases and installations.

What most Americans are unaware of, is that like Hillary Clinton selling our Uranium to Russia, President Obama sold one of America’s seaports to a foreign company called Crescent. As a favor to an ex-college roommate who’s allegiance lies with Iran and other middle eastern countries, mostly sworn to destroy America, President Obama made a secret deal to give complete control of The Port of Wilmington in the State of Delaware, to a company called Gulftainer, which is  a shell company of Crescent, which has dealings with Russia, Iran, and some other unsavory sworn enemies of the United States. This secret deal allows this company, Gulftainer to basically bring cargo containers into the Port of Wilmington, unchecked for their contents.

 What most Americans also are unaware of is that Russia has developed ballistic missile launchers, capable of carrying any type of warhead, and delivering it anywhere in the U.S. that are disguised as these cargo containers. The scary thing is that many of these weaponize containers could be sitting in port right now. Even more alarming, is that many of these containers may have already been transported to places that lie in close proximity to any military installation in the country. That being said, I suggest that President Trump, through Executive Order, for national security reasons, shut down the Port of Wilmington, search all the containers there for contraband and weapons, and check the destination manifest as to the location of every container that has entered the port since Obama made the deal.

This makes family separation at the border, and Russian interference look like spilt milk. One only needs to look at some of the alarming Youtube video information that is out there to evaluate for oneself the gravity of this national security threat, and the lengths taken by President Obama to keep the deal under the radar.

Recent Hearings on Capitol Hill

In watching the hearings interviewing Christopher Wray, the F.B.I. Director, and Rod Rosenstein, the assistant Attorney General, it seems that the Democrats were more focused on President Trump’s tweets than the miscarriage of justice perpetuated by Peter Strzok and how the D.O.J. has handled the matter.

The focus of the hearings was to get some answers from the bureau, and the D.O.J. with regard to the delays in documents being provided to Congress, that are required by law, for proper oversight for the American people as to the conduct of the two agencies. Two of the democratic Congresswomen totally flew off base, with one obsessing about the possibility of racial profiling of police officers mistakenly shooting African-American suspects. The other Democrat Congresswoman went on a tirade about the separation of families attempting to enter the country illegally, with the basis of her concerns, mostly on fake news and unsubstantiated rumors about what is actually happening there, and why.

All that being said, the last time I checked, “tweeting” falls under the category of one’s first amendment rights, regardless of what position or office they may hold. Furthermore “Tweets” are by definition, opinions and are not evidence that can be used to indict someone of a crime or for that matter, a definition of one’s character. If the Democrats would spend less time subjectively interpreting the President’s tweets, and more on serving the constituents that elected them, maybe they would have a better approval rating, and who knows maybe accomplish some good things for this country.

Supreme Court New Appointee

Once again, the Democrats are trying to extinguish the flames, as their hair has spontaneously combusted over the inevitable appointment of another Supreme Court Justice by President Trump, because of the retiring Anthony Kennedy.

As boasted by Senate Democrats, they would rather obstruct the nomination, than allow the wheels of the judicial system to turn freely. Obstruction of the President’s agenda is more important than the rule of law in this country. Let’s not forget that President Obama also appointed two Supreme Court Justices, Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. These Democrats that insist on obstruction, simply for obstruction sake are doing a huge disservice to this country, and need to either face censure or impeachment.

 Even more disturbing, is the treasonous actions of Maxine Waters to engage in a public request of American citizens to commit the unlawful act of harassment of public officials, simply because the are on opposite sides of the political aisle. Waters, a devout racist in my opinion, has been the loudest voice to accuse the president of crimes not yet defined, and the first to call for impeachment.

I think she and all those in Congress that support the theory that the president is guilty until proven innocent, should be the first for consideration of impeachment, and actually, Waters should be arrested for her actions. If she and others in the Liberal wing of the Democratic party had it their way, and we were under a Socialist government; Waters would be arrested for subversion, and most likely never see the light of day again.

Prosecuting Illegal Immigrants

Let us reflect for a moment on the whole principle of prosecuting illegal immigrants. Wouldn’t this be considered the ultimate in oxymorons? Isn’t the whole premise of prosecution in general terms, an attempt to get restitution from a criminal actor? Whether they pay the debt to society through a term of incarceration or public service or the form of a fine imposed on the convicted person. So I ask this; how do you suppose arresting and charging someone who has attempted to enter the country illegally, and prosecuting them, are we as Americans getting restitution for the crime of those who actually go through the process?

Are these people being tracked and their wages garnished when and if they are gainfully employed? Will putting them into an already overburdened prison system at an expense to taxpaying Americans somehow be misconstrued into a debt paid rather than burden to society? There is no debt or restitution that can be obtained from those who attempt to enter our country illegally, period. The only reasonable course of action is to temporarily detain these people until enough of them for instance, from any particular country, can be transported back to their country of origin in the most cost effective manner possible.

In other words, when let’s say fifty people from Guatemala are detained, or can fill the seats on an aircraft, or other transport, they are deported back to that given country. After these repeat offenders make the arduous journey a few times resulting in their ultimate return to their country of origin, they will get the message. Applying the principle of prosecution is the epitome definition of “squeezing water from a stone”. 

Though daunting, the process of transporting as a means of deportation is far less expensive, and far more humane than long terms of incarceration, while the wheels of American justice turn their course, and ultimately result in the offender entering the country illegally anyway. We are a country of laws, but when the offense is essentially trespass, what can be gained through the criminal justice process?