I don’t know what the delay is in charging Walz, Ellis, and Omar and arresting the three of them on different charges. First of all, it’s not for Pam Bondi to decide if people can be convicted of a crime before charging and arresting them. If there is evidence that Omar committed bigamy to deceive immigration authorities to get her brother citizenship, then she becomes what is known as a suspect, and is subsequently subject to arrest.
If there is evidence that Tim Walz was derelict in his duties as governor, again, he is a suspect and is subject to be arrested. If Keith Ellis, the Minnesota A.G. is suspected of accepting money from an N.G.O. that has committed fraud against the taxpayers of his state, then he too is subject to arrest and charges brought. It is Pam Bondi’s job to recommend charges, not to insure a conviction. That is handled by the prosecution and defense attorneys in court with a judge determining the sentence.
For example: If a white Ford Bronco is believed to be involved in a crime, and I am driving a white Ford Bronco in the vicinity of said crime I am what is called a “Suspect” and am subject to be arrested, and may have to hire an attorney, post bond, and prove my case in court. I don’t understand what is so hard about this. All three of the people I have mentioned are “Suspects”. Why are they immune from arrest unlike the rest of society?