Legislative Testimony

In watching the Affidavit testimony of several witnesses, in three of the six states where election fraud has obviously taken place, the Democratic Legislators have all been unified in their defense. The sworn affidavits are insufficient “evidence” or that The Attorney General, William Barr has claimed that he has “not seen any evidence of fraud”.

To the first point that The Democratic Legislators are making: Why in the hell would anyone go through that much effort to file these affidavits just because they support any given candidate in the election? The winning or losing candidate has absolutely no personal connection to them, nor can one predict how the outcome would or wouldn’t affect them on that same level, unless they were genuinely concerned citizens about wrong doing that they witnessed. Many of the witnesses have attested to just that.

To the second point regarding Barr: If he hasn’t seen or been given the affidavits for review, then he can’t say that he has seen any evidence. Regardless, Attorney General Barr has absolutely nothing to do with these legislative hearings, as they are being conducted at the state level, as well as any investigations that are being done to that regard. In light of the fact, however, which Barr has unnecessarily weighed in, and in a controversial statement, he needs to either be replaced or keep silent until he has reviewed the facts. I am of the opinion of the latter, as he has given neither indication about The Durham Report one way or the other, nor any indication as to Hunter Biden’s nefarious deeds, which should have come out before the election. I think it’s long overdue that both Barr and Wray be replaced. I would suggest that Matthew Whittaker replace Bill Barr, and perhaps Bernard Kerik or Dan Bongino to replace Christopher Wray to head up The F.B.I.

These are all the same distraction tactics that we are sick and tired of seeing and hearing over the past four years, and I’m waiting to see how “The Race Card” is going to come into play here, because historically, it has to be pulled out of the Democrat “playbook” at some point.

Attorney General William Barr Controversy

Rumor has it that a thousand judges, I can assume they are all Democrats, have signed a petition forAttorney General William Barr to step down. This is all because Barr agreed to a judge’s decision reversal about the sentencing recommendation reduction from nine years of prison time for Roger Stone, a long time associate of President Trump, which would probably have him die of old age in the correctional facility.

The whole Democrat dumpster fire started because President Trump tweeted that he was dissatisfied with the decision. This, however, happened after the judge presiding over the case flip flopped a couple times and before Barr or The President even weighed in, publicly about the issue, but as usual the Democrats and their media servants are so hungry for some red meat that can be used against The Trump Administration, that they flew off the handle and jumped to conclusions, and aired them on primetime, before knowing the actual facts and timelines of the situation. 

I suggest that The Trump Administration keep track of the names of these judges and seek to have them thrown off the bench. Any judge that is willing to make a predisposed decision before the facts are laid out before them has no business occupying the position. I feel sorry for the poor bastards that are being tried in courtrooms before these hacks, no matter what the political affiliation, and forget about it if these judges already know that the person is a Republican.

The Democrats keep hammering it home that nobody is above the law. The problem is, as an example, that The Speaker of The House of Representatives can commit a class b felony by tearing up an official document that is destined for The Library of Congress, in front of millions of witnesses, but not tickets are written, no charges filed. This country has a huge problem when political theater is exempt from legal ramifications, never mind the double standards for these treasonous Democrats that are supposedly public servants.

 Any American has to be extremely concerned about these obvious miscarriages of justice regardless of political affiliation, unless they are living under a rock. To condone this stuff is like betting on a race horse, knowing damn well it’s on steroids or a boxing match where one guy has lead weights in his gloves, and profiting from the results.

 I don’t care how devoted someone is to a political affiliation, there is right and there is wrong no gray area with this stuff. Has this country got to a point where winning is all that matters? No matter how rigged the contest? Would it be okay if The Chiefs won The Super Bowl because they had a copy of The Forty Niner’s play book?